Nora Prentiss

All movies should be set in San Francisco. (Well, except for the ones set in New York, of course.)

Very noir.

Oooo! Suspicious music!

So noir.

Wow, he really looks different without that stache.

The plot here is… it’s… It doesn’t really work.

I was really into the first half of this movie, but it’s just getting a bit annoying.

The hat designer on this movie worked overtime.

See?

I think the plot is just so crazy that it’s hard to take the movie seriously. I kinda stopped paying attention towards the end.

Nora Prentiss. Vincent Sherman. 1947.

Next Stop, Greenwich Village

I’m watching this because it’s on the list.

Oh, Paul Mazursky… I feel like I used to see his name all the time, but haven’t seen it mentioned at all for decades.

Oh, right… I have seen a lot of these movies, but not his 70s films.

Ah, rural Brooklyn…

The promised land…

The promised beret.

The lighting on this is pretty odd. Usually just a single lamp, so you get a lot of hard shadows. So it’s not natural lighting, either. Could they only afford a single lamp?

It fun to watch a movie made in the 70s that’s so nostalgic for the 50s. (The cool bits of the 50s, i.e. New York, mind you.)

Hey!

I’m going alternatively “wow, this is really good” and “wow, this is really cheesy”. Like every other scene or something.

The performances are good, and I like the look of the movie. The plot has a few surprises, but is pretty much what you’d expect. It’s a nice movie.

Next Stop, Greenwich Village. Paul Mazursky. 1976.

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga

Heh heh.

There’s a lot of awesome shots here, but the movie also looks just really weird.

Like… it’s been overly smoothed or something? I’ve watching the 4K bluray, and it’s just odd-looking.

Heh heh.

Heh.

Oh, it’s Thor!

I’m 40 minutes in, and I’m really bored. And there’s almos two hours to go? Oh deer.

The digital compositing is really bad — perhaps that’s what makes so many scenes look so awkward?

Yeah, nobody would ever guess that that’s a girl!

This movie, so far, would have been better as a two paragraph Wikipedia recap. That’s what it feels like watching this — somebody making a movie from a recap.

OK, that’s good stunt…

But then the next shot, they have the worst digital explosion ever. It’s just… eh.

That’s an oddly CGI-looking crane thing.

OMG! SHE”S A GIRL WITH GIRLY HAIR

*sigh*

But it was a fun action scene.

This should have had a Charli XCX soundtrack.

The charm of Fury Road was how real much of it looked (because quite a lot was real). This does not have that feel at all. Which makes me wonder abour the budget.

Oh man. I didn’t know that this bombed. Anyway, the Fury Road budget was:

So this had a larger budget than Fury Road, but looks so much worse. Some of the scenes here are just cringe-worthy — they’ve composited Thor into a car and do digital zooms to emulate him driving towards the camera and stuff.

There are entertaining scenes in here, but this is barely a movie. I was bored witless most of the time. And I was disappointed that it looked this bad.

Furiosa. George Miller. 2024.