The Devil and Miss Jones

Well, those are some titles.

Heh heh. Very topical.

I want my hallway to look like that…

Oh, right — I’m finally watching a movie again, and it’s yet another movie from the Hazel Flagg collection:

Hm, Sam Wood… I’ve seen a handful of his movies, and I haven’t particularly enjoyed them. Lot’s of schmaltz, if I remember correctly.

This is quite amusing so far. It’s very high concept — a millionaire is distraught over people not liking rich people, so he gets a job in a department store to see what The Common People really think.

I do like Jean Arthur.

Oh, it’s about unionisation and stuff, too?

Yeah, Robert Cummings isn’t very exciting, even though it’s almost a good name.

I really like these set designs — they’re slightly exaggerated and unreal.

Heh heh. They could really afford to hire extras back in the days.

This movie is kinda interesting — I mean, there’s a lot of slightly oddball shots, like on the beach, or this — but they really work.

But on the other hand, it needs more jokes. I mean, it’s not a screwball comedy, and it’s not trying to be, but still.

On the other hand, it’s really got this mood going… it’s a very cute movie.

Such romance.

Yes! General strike! All workers united!

This is a really fun movie. Jean Arthur is great, and Charles Coburn is… Charles Coburn, which is always a plus. I laughed out loud a couple of times… and did it land everybody involved in the HUAC eventually? Seems likely.

The Devil and Miss Jones. Sam Wood. 1941.

I could only find this on bluray in Spain? Not uncommon, the Spanish apparently still love physical formats? And it’s not dubbed, so whatevs.

High, Wide and Handsome

Yes, it’s another Hazel Flagg recommendation.

Could that be the hero!?

Oh yeah, Randolph Scott? He kinda looks like Number One if you squint a bit.

Well, this is amiable and stuff, but… it doesn’t seem to rise above the usual studio fodder of the 30s? I mean, that fodder is good eatin’, but…

Seems like the people at imdb agree.

These tunes (by Hammerstein without Rodgers) aren’t particularly catchy — they’re operettaish?

That’s true — it looks really good. And Irene Dunne is great. The rest… eh…

PIPES! PIPES!

There’s fun scenes, but it doesn’t really hold the attention.

High, Wide and Handsome. Rouben Mamoulian. 1937.

Carnal Knowledge

This is yet another one of those 70s movies that I’ve heard about all my life, but had never really considered actually watching.

And it’s once again because of something @hazelflag wrote, but I can’t find it now, because Twitter has once again fucked up their search.

It wasn’t this one, in any case.

And this has Art Garfunkel!?

That’s some grade A framing.

Oh yeah, that’s Candice Bergen?

Oh… they’re all supposed to be going to college? So they’re supposed to be like 20? And Jack Nicholson er 34 and Garfunkel is 30?

Movies are confusing.

Art Garfunkel really isn’t a very good actor…

It’s a funny movie.

But it’s like… some of the drama seems pretty… fake.

Oh, OK, now they’re older… then I guess the casting makes sense…

Garfunkel’s still not a better actor.

Oh, I’d forgotten that Mike Nichols had done All These Movies… I’ve seen… at least half? Two thirds? But I haven’t seen Catch-22, for instance.

These shots are really wonderful. They’re not exactly naturalistic, but… better.

Oh, the cinematographer has done a million movies — but more importantly, dozens of movies by Fellini. Now it makes sense.

So great.

Hey! Carol Kane!

I think we’re in the future!

Now I remember where I remember this movie being mentioned… It’s the Comics Journal, of course. Because it’s written by Jules Feiffer.

Anyway, it’s a pretty oddly shaped movie, but it works.

Carnal Knowledge. Mike Nichols. 1971.