Star Trek: Section 31

Well, that’s no way to govern an empire. They do Hunger Games to choose an emperor?

“You have 24 hours to complete the mission.” Common.

This looks so cheap. Everything is greenscreen, of course, but the CGId environments look like they’ve been outsourced to Fiverr. To their credit, they try to hide the decrepit environments by only showing them for half a second at a time, and zooming in on faces almost the entire time, but…

First of all, this is a lot of fun. Sorry, I’m lying: I’m flabbergasted at how tedious this is. My jaw is down to here. How is it possible to be this bad?

I totally see what they’re going for — a kind of zany Guardians of the Galaxy thing. But there’s zero chemistry, there’s zero charm, and there are zero gags that actually work.

I don’t think anybody’s given the inside story on this, but it was originally supposed to be a “dark, edgy” TV series, but then Michelle Yeoh got more famous and refused. So they retooled to do a single movie with her, and went “zany” instead… but the writers and producers involved (just go ahead and watch Star Trek: Discovery) have no sense of humour at all.

I had hoped that it was just the usual Nazi brigading:

But this is astonishingly bad. I mean, I’m not speechless, but it’s so bad that most people in my situation would lie and say “I’m speechless”.

OK, we’re 40 minutes into the movie — is it finally going to start?

x

It’s the God’s End!

“I am a science officer, and science is controlled chaos.”

There’s been a lot of really bad Star Trek stuff. Remember Picard s1? No? Well, good for you. But this is off the scale. It’s amazing that they had the chutzpah to 1) film this and then 2) show it to people. I feel bad for Michelle Yeoh that they made her do this, and I feel bad for myself that I watched this. But I didn’t have to!

I won’t say it’s the worst movie I’ve ever seen, because I’ve seen a lot of stuff, but it’s the worst movie I’ve seen in quite a while.

Star Trek: Section 31. Olatunde Osunsanmi. 2025.

Shampoo

Oh, that’s some cast…

Anyway, I got this movie because I watched Harold & Maude the other month, and this is another movie by Hal Ashby. And I’m pretty sure I’ve never seen this before.

But! I read the Mad Magazine parody of this many times as a child. I don’t really remember the parody either at this point, though, so I basically know nothing.

Sure, phones have a light in the handset…

Goldie!

Is Beatty wearing a wig? That’s a lot of hair.

Is Christie wearing a wig, too? That’s a lot of hair!

This is extremely Robert Altmanesque. But I guess that entire thing was a more general 70s movie thing — lots of people talking across each other; people constantly being interrupted; people changing their minds…

They put her in a new wig!

Oh, he’s wearing a wig, too; right.

They hid Carrie Fisher’s wig under a scarf…

Oh my god! Christie’s wig keeps on growing! Is this a comment on er something?

It’s very political.

Is Beatty’s character supposed to be like 25? His acting is all over the place… I don’t quite get what this movie is, like, about? I mean, I’m kinda enjoying it on a scene by scene basis, but it seems so unfocused. Perhaps that’s the point.

I guess the election in 1968 was when the US went off the rails.

Well, at least they didn’t spend half the budget on these wigs, because they look cheap.

THEY GAVE HER AN EVEN BIGGER WIG

It’s like Big Helmet big.

Hey, I found that Mad Magazine parody!

Oh! That explains so much.

I’m a bit torn on this one… on the one hand, I like the general feel of the movie. On the other hand, I found the third to be deathly dull.

Shampoo. Hal Ashby. 1975.

Venom: The Last Dance

This is a fun way to start a movie… but… is this referring to the previous Venom movie or the Spider-Man multiverse movie? I don’t know!

So here’s the problem — I like movies that doesn’t explain things at us. But I’m not at all sure whether I’m just supposed to get references to previous movies (that I don’t remember at all) or other movies (that I don’t remember, either), and that’s just frustrating. That is, I don’t know whether I’m supposed to be confused (complementary) or whether I’m just not getting some fan service (derogatory).

That’s a normal amount of mascara and eye shadow for a top scientist.

I love how they commit to the dirty t-shirt bit. Tom Hardy is a hero — most other leading actors would have insisted on cooler clothes.

This is like a perfect super-hero movie.

Oops! Just after I said that thing about the t-shirt he changes into a dinner jacket.

The first third of this is a lot of fun…

… and then the last two thirds are just a long fight scene, mostly CGI in the dark. These are choices.

So…

I understand both the tomatometer and the popcronmeter here: If you’re a professional reviewer having to review this thing, you’re not going to like it. It’s pretty oddly paced, and lacks all the things that make a “good movie”. On the other hand, if you’re an audience member who’ve watched two of these movie before, and you choose to watch this one — you’re not going to be disappointed, because it’s more of the thing you liked in the first two movies… only even more so.

Myself, I liked it. I think it’s better than the first two movies — it’s really focused. It’s mostly just one fight scene after we get past setting the scene? It feels like you’re watching a stupid super-hero comic book, for better or worse.

Venom: The Last Dance. Kelly Marcel. 2024.