Funny Girl

Oh, wow — a five minute overture with a completely black screen.

Wasn’t there another movie that did something similar? But with a screen that said “Overture”? Like… er… one of the big tropical musicals of the 50s?

I think I probably saw this on VHS back in the 80s — one of those movies that came on a double VHS tape, probably. But I have absolutely zero recollection of the movie. Is this a musical? I’m not sure.

I picked it up now because it’s a new 4K restoration from Criterion and I was shopping at their site and I just went “hm!”.

Oh, William Wyler!

Barbra!

Yup, it’s a musical. From 1968!

This 4K restoration looks sensational. The audio, though — it sounds a bit… too cleaned up? Like all the sounds have been made separately on a sound stage. It just sounds a bit canned? And there’s pre-echoes and weird stuff… It’s odd.

You know — I’ve never really liked Omar Sharif. Ever since I was a child I found him smarmy and artificial, and that hasn’t changed. So whenever he’s playing the romantic lead, it’s an uphill battle for me. It’s like watching a movie with Michael Douglas in the lead — I’m always hoping that his character will die and I don’t have to watch him on the screen any more.

Come to think of it, they are my least two favourite actors ever, and they do rather resemble one another, don’t they?

This is Barbra’s go-to thing — looking a bit to the side of and a bit over the camera — not actually at the character she’s talking to… really works.

It’s an amusing movie.

It is a pretty odd conceit — the thing is that Barbra is supposed to be this horribly ugly and/or funny-looking girl, so she can’t play glamour roles, but only funny bits.

And… er… that doesn’t really work now does it?

This is where you switch VHS tapes.

I have no idea how Sharif became a Hollywood star. It seems so odd — he has few obvious qualities…

The first half of this movie was pretty amusing, but the second half is mostly drama, and it’s just not very convincing.

Much of that is down to Sharif (because he’s having the drama), but it’s just a bit on the boring side script-wise, too.

There should have been more musical numbers — they could have incorporated the drama into the music instead, perhaps?

So much drama:

Egyptian Omar Sharif was cast to star opposite the Jewish Streisand after Wyler noticed him having lunch in the studio commissary. When the Six-Day War between Israel and Egypt broke out, studio executives considered replacing Sharif, but both Wyler and Streisand threatened to quit if they did. Later, the publication of a still depicting a love scene between Fanny and Nicky in the Egyptian press prompted a movement to revoke Sharif’s citizenship.

Man, Hollywood was strange:

Wyler crafted various scenarios to foment romantic impulses between the two stars; one such tactic was to place Streisand’s trailer window in direct, but hidden view of Sharif’s. One of Wyler’s assistants later gave Sharif the go-ahead to use the on-set shower while Streisand was still using it. These stratagems bore the fruit Wyler intended. An affair did indeed take place between Sharif and Streisand for the duration of filming.

Oh, and there was a sequel — I remember reading the Mad Magazine version of that movie.

Well — Barbra is good and carries the movie. And also the music — the music is totally Now That’s What I Call Vamping Over Musical Standard Chords, but with her singing, it sorta works.

But I have to say that I was rather disappointed by this movie.

Funny Girl. William Wyler. 1968. ⚃

Hatari!

Hey, is that the guy who always plays Nazis? Yeah, his name is “Kurt”.

Hawks did some really bad movies towards the end of his career — I tried watching Red Line 7000 (made three years after this) a couple years ago, but had to throw in the towel — it was unwatchable tripe.

This one doesn’t have James Caan, at least.

I’m glad the animals cooperated.

But I’m sad that this bluray has been cut down to 16:9 — it was originally 1.85:1, so I’m not missing much, but still! Boo!!!

I love these kinds of shots.

This is much much much much better than Red Line 7000. It’s kinda fun and pretty cute.

See!?

So this seems to be a lighthearted romantic comedy? But in Africa? And there’s probably going to be a plot involving some action? We’re twenty minutes in, and it still feels like the movie hasn’t really started yet, but it’s very amiable.

This is pretty insane. I guess they couldn’t shoot this kind of stuff today? Which is good, because those giraffes looked pretty spooked. Tsk tsk!

(Oh yeah — this movie is about this gang of people who are capturing wildlife for a zoo.)

Heh heh. It was the 60s, man!

That’s a very friendly cheetah.

That’s supposed to really be John Wayne doing his own stunts?

But I’m starting to think that this doesn’t really have a plot? We’re over an hour in, and it’s just… these people capturing animals. And some romance going on. But the movie is 2h40m long, so I guess something’s going to happen…

p

But I guess this is just going to be this — skits in the camp while they’re taking care of animals?

Pssn’t! Pssn’t!

It’s almost fascinating how none of the black actors have a single line — not even “whoo” or “noo” or something.

I’m wondering whether there’s gonna be a dreaded Third Act where you get all the drama…

This movie is cancelled!

Double cancelled!

OK, this monkey stunt makes absolutely no sense what so ever, but it’s funny.

Oh, that ditty sounds very familiar…

Aaah:

The memorable Henry Mancini tune “Baby Elephant Walk” was written for and first appeared in Hatari!.

The film quality difference between the insets (like the above) and the actual capture shots is striking:

But still impressive:

Much of the audio in the capture sequences had to be redubbed due to John Wayne’s cursing while wrestling with the animals

Are they eating just pineapple for breakfast!? A quarter each!?

OK, I guess they didn’t know how to end the movie, so they went all out on slapstick.

I really enjoyed this film, but… it’s 160 minutes of driving around on the veldt, catching animals, interspersed with romantic skits. It’s extremely amiable… but is it a good movie?

I’ve often thought “but why do movie have to have all this conflict and stuff? Can’t it just be about fun stuff?” And this movie sort of answers that — there is no real conflict to speak of, and all the drama is supplied by them driving around among the animals…

I think this could have been tightened up a bit — but when you have all this great footage, why would you cut anything?

It’s a very silly movie. I liked it.

Hatari!. Howard Hawks. 1962. ⚄

Scarface

I’ve been watching a lot of movies from the 70s lately — it sorta happened by accident: I’ve been watching the Alan Clarke box set, and I’ve also been following movie recommendations from Hazel Flagg (which are heavy on 70s movies). And then I just started watching random 70s movies, because the 70s is a decade I’ve been avoiding slightly?

But enough’s enough. Time to watch something else for a while!

Yeah, yeah, sure…

That’s the ticket.

Before I went all 70s, I bought a stack of Howard Hawks movies I’ve never seen before. I was watching Bringing Up Baby or something yet again and I went “well, what’s with all his other movies?”

And his movies are so … indifferently available? Some aren’t at all — the big ones are obviously meticulously restored and everything, but then there’s a lot more movies that are like this one — it’s fine, but … a bit fuzzy. It’s like they upscaled the film digitally — but it’s been nicely stabilised and despeckled.

Well… I know that this is one of the most influential mafia movies. And well liked:

But I don’t quite get it. It seems pretty leaden? None of the performances are much fun, and the direction is mostly pretty pedestrian. I mean, there’s some really nice dolly shots, but there’s also a lot of scenes that look a bit clumsy.

But then there’s shots like this.

Heh heh.

Tee hee. Hawks wasn’t afraid of getting rubbed out — he’s depicting the mobsters as illiterate morons and perverts.

Well, OK, it’s starting to get pretty funny now.

OK, this is very amusing.

And it’s a pro gun control movie, too.

I know, I know, this is a classic. And there’s some really funny scenes, and there’s some really striking sequences. But on the other hand, there’s so many turgid scenes — it’s like the movie was made by two directors filming separate scenes.

It’s just not altogether there — I suspect that the reputation has been bolstered by the movie being unavailable for many years.

Scarface. Howard Hawks. 1932. ⚂