India Song

This is probably the movie I’ve watched the most times… and now there’s a 2K restoration from Criterion, so now I’m watching it again.

I usually type these things while I’m watching the movies, whenever I’m bored or something, but once again, I was so enthralled by this movie that I watched the entire thing without typing a single thing, so I’m writing this after the fact.

These are very day-for-nightish day-for-night shots, eh?

Some directors, like Chantal Akerman, has had a real rediscovery thing going on over the past few years. Even Claire Denis, I guess, although she’s still doing movies — her films have also gotten more attention. Marguerite Duras’ movies? Not really, but it’s good that this movie (and Baxter, Very Baxter) have at least been restored.

The last time I watched this was on a very grainy DVD — and this restoration is very nicely done, but is a lot less gritty than it used to be.

I guess one of the attractions of this movie is that we’re watching people, and then on the soundtrack we’re mostly listening to people gossiping about the people we’re watching.

The other major selling point is the soundtrack.

India Song (Thème, piano)

That’s like such a fantastic song. It seems like one of those songs that have always existed, like an Erik Satie tune…

India Song - Richard Jobson

Oh, if you want to know the plot of this film, you can just listen to this Richard Jobson track from The Fruit of the Original Sin. I had the album when I was like fourteen, so I’d listened to the story dozens and dozens of times before I saw the movie for the first time.

My only problem with this movie is the casting of the French vice-consul (from Lahore). I mean, he’s supposed to be a tragic nerd, but still… couldn’t they have found a better actor!?

I mean, just look at the way he holds his cigarette! That’s awful!

I should get more mirrors for my living room.

That’s what I want my apartment to look like!

Anyway, fantastic movie. I loved it even more this time around, possibly.

India Song . Marguerite Duras. 1975.

The Furies

This is a 2K version from Criterion, but the restoration is… odd? Like, the titles had a lot of sideways judder, and some scenes seem inexplicably dark… but perhaps they were that way to start with?

Err… I think that used to be a Hazel Flagg post? But now it’s something else? The ways of Twitter are inscrutable. But it’s the reason I’m watching this.

Where’s the RSPCA!?

Huh, the blu-ray package is very thick…

Oh! It includes an entire novel!?

That’s new.

Nooo! Quicksand! The most lethal substance on Earth!

This movie is just odd. There’s strange continuity problems, and the plot is just… odd.

Wat

*scratches head*

Sure sure she’s suddenly in love with this guy… but why!? He’s not shown to have any qualities, and whoever cast this actor in this role didn’t do a good job, because it’s just “wat”.

See?

I mean, if it had been, like, Clark Gable or something, it’d have made some kind of sense, but as it is, this bit just seems to tell the audience that the Stanwyck character is … stupid?

Which I don’t think is supposed to be the thing.

That’s an odd way to frame this scene. And what’s with that flare at the edge? Did they just mess it up and couldn’t re-shoot the paper maché boulder falling?

It’s just an odd, odd, movie.

Very day for night.

Excel(lent).

So weird.

Why is so much of this movie filmed in apparent semi-darkness? I mean, it’s a look, but…

I’m back to my original theory — that something went wrong during restoration.

In a way I admire the sheer weirdness of the plot. I mean, it’s not a standard western? And that’s fun? But I don’t think the movie works. Mann was known for B movie noirs, but in 1950 he did three (!) westerns, and you can definitely see that. I mean, both the noir background and that the movie was done in a hurry.

The lines are just preposterous, and while Stanwyck does a great job chewing the scenery, none of the other actors are compelling, really.

I think this is one of those rediscovered masterpieces that might as well have remained forgotten.

The Furies. Anthony Mann. 1950.

Mr. Skeffington

Yes, it’s another movie from the Hazel Flagg collection, but apparently the account has been taken over by hackers or something? So I’m not linking to the tweet.

I haven’t seen this before, and I can’t even remember seeing the name about. And I can’t even remember hearing about it before — and I had to get it on DVD, so I’m guessing it’s not really a major movie?

Bette!

Oh right, this was done during WWII.

The sets seem really cheap? Whenever somebody closes a door, everything shakes. No, it’s got a pretty big budget…

Odd stache.

It’s a very dramatic drama… and moves so slooowly.

It’s a kinda odd movie? The Betty Davis character is supposed to be absolutely adored by all men, but we’re not being shown any reason for that (I mean, beyond the obvious): Her character doesn’t really have much character, so we just have to take all that on faith.

I guess one problem is that Davis and Claude Rains have absolutely zero chemistry going on… but I guess that’s also a plot point, really, but still…

Oh, heh, and now they’re infodumping the point I was typing just now, so I guess I’m understanding the movie well. But it still doesn’t actually make the movie thrilling. I hope it’s going to take off and become funnier now that they’ve gotten the plot (and the sappy bits) out of the way. Possibly.

Oh no! I’d almost forgotten about him! So much drama!

Kids say the darndest things.

Hubba hubba!

There casting here is pretty weird all over — now the daughter is also inexplicably attractive?

Oh no! Don’t get wet! Getting wet is fatal!

And very aging.

Oh my god

That’s genius.

I did quite like this movie, but I’m not sure it actually works? I mean, as a movie? It’s like a catalogue of things that should be annoying, but it’s not?

I do like the war propaganda bits in particular.

Mr. Skeffington. Vincent Sherman. 1944.