Alien: Romulus

Hey, this looks great.

The CGI… not as much.

Obvious why she got cast!

I haven’t tried not to read reviews of this, but I just don’t remember: Is this a reboot? Or just another movie?

I guess the Alien “franchise” is pretty unique in that it started with two stone cold classics (in two different genres). Then David Fincher destroyed it, and it’s continued more as a normal 80s-spawned franchise… and there’s also a TV series now?

But I think I’ve seen them all, so while I have no particular enthusiasm for this thing any more, why not see this one too.

Huh, very odd — it’s like she seems rendered?

Hey, this is pretty good — all the gadgets seem very 70s futuristic.

The CGI, not so much.

Did I say that already?

Heh, props to them for doing a dummy instead of CGI, but the dummy could really have done with a bigger budget.

This movie feels like a very 2024 movie trying its very hardest to try to be the 70s Alien. It gets so many things right — the props department is just amazing, and it manages to recreate some of the creepy scenes.

The bad parts are the 2024 bits: You have the android giving fan service by repeating some of Sigourney’s tag lines, and it’s just totes cringe. Worse is how aggressively stupid even little details are (in a way that wouldn’t have been tolerated in the original Alien) — like the cryo fuel being really really cold for some reason, or everything flying off into the air all of a sudden when gravity is switched off, or or or.

The start, where they introduced the characters was very efficient, and then there were good scenes of chasing xenomorphs. Good performances, for the most part. Got boring halfway through, but I think the props alone qualify this as the third best Alien movie.

The Ian Holm thing was odd… at the start it was obviously a puppet, but then in some later scenes it was (bad) CGI… I have to google that.

Ah, right:

Since the character was always created through “a mix of techniques”, it meant recalibrating the various elements, both practical and digital, that brought Rook to life. “[Animatronic puppeteer] Shane Mahan actually did this animatronic of Ian Holm based on a head cast from Lord Of The Rings, and that was the only one in existence,” says Alvarez, noting that, further into production, the choice was made to lean much more on digital effects. “What we did [for the home entertainment version] was revert a lot more to the puppet,” the filmmaker says. “It’s way better.”

Here’s a comparison. Yeah, it’s better with less CGI.

Alien: Romulus. Fede Alvarez. 2024.

The Good Fairy

Yes, I’m continuing my series of movies that I’ve bought because Hazel Flagg said so.

Ooo! Preston Sturges!

This is a very nice 2K restoration — but it makes the difference between the straight-up shots like this…

… and the dissolves even more stark: When it’s dissolving like this, it’s like we’re dropping down to EEEK before going back to 2K. I mean, dissolves always looks worse (after all, they’re at least three generations further along than normal shots), but…

Ooo. Is that a combination of matte paintings and a set? Or all set? Looks great anyway.

Hey, I’ve laughed out loud several times already.

Heh heh heh.

Heh heh heh.

Heh heh heh.

Man, this is so funny. And it’s one of the loopiest scripts ever — just totally preposterous, and I love that. Great performances from everybody involved.

The Good Fairy. William Wyler. 1935.

You Can’t Take It With You

He’s so evil!

I take it that Capra wasn’t big on getting involved with the situation in Europe?

Exactly!

Now that’s a party!

This movie is cornier than a corn field in Kansas. But I love corn.

This should have been a bit snappier, though. The good scenes are wonderful, but it doesn’t really warrant the length.

You Can’t Take It With You. Frank Capra. 1938.